UX evaluation by experts | Free for a limited time

Real examples from past reviews

The hamburger icon is unnecessary on desktop, does not serve any purpose here, when closed the icons are not clear (but it is going to be useful on mobile)

The gray color of menu items indicate that they are disabled, even when we are on the page

The 'glasses' view icon is not intuitive (hard to find, people would click on the whole row instead of a specific icon to find out more), plus the cursor is not changing when we move over a row, so everything seems clickable in the table.

Previous button placement is very unfamiliar

No clear call to action anywhere on the page
It’s hard to know where I am at the moment and how I got there

Overuse of the blue color, not clear what is a button what is not, what is clickable, nothing to lead the eye (profile pops up because of the dark color but that shouldn't be the focus)

Inconsistent look of the icons (colored or black)

Unnecessary, very big header

First impression: Does not seem like a dashboard
Users have no idea where to focus at first

Tables are really small, hard to read

Selected filtering aspect is not prominent enough, seems inactive

No labeling or coding in charts, it's very hard to interpret them

Lot of unnecessary white space and everything is small

No hierarchy at buttons anywhere on the pages (no primary and secondary buttons), can also cause problems in navigation and not prompts error prevention

Proximity and padding is off, there is a lot of space between columns in summary pages with no hierarchy (not clear what is a title) hard to read and skim through

Filter placement is really off (maybe not even needed for the dashboard)

Tabs and header are not making much sense for a dashboard

Not user friendly that the profile section is not editable and the placement is very prominent as is

No error prevention. Missing undo actions and feedback when performing an action
Copy issues: Things named differently on different pages, error messages and table headers are not specific enough.

Icons color and placement varies between pages, they all should be on the left

Filter is out of place very far from the table and graph so it's not clear what does it have an effect on, it's not a familiar pattern

The apply button placement is wrong and the icon that is a refresh sign is also confusing (the button can be gone by applying the filters on selection)

Filter's default state is ”All” instead of empty

Same icons are used several times for different purposes (dollar sign, refresh)

Actions affecting the tables (GPOs, contracts) should not be in the header, but closer to the table itself

Affordance is missing, buttons and clickable items are too small, hard to click with the cursor
Buttons states are inconsistent, there is no feedback on hover, click.

Laura Lovejoy

General Manager at

TrustDALE

"The final report exceeded our expectations."

Aleksandra Lipovac

Product Design Lead at

Syskit

"I was impressed by their focus on understanding our work and the specific use cases we deal with."

Martha V. Pearlstone

CMO at

News Direct

“They were a 'quick study' in terms of understanding our category rapidly."

Slavka Sakata

Climate Change Adaptation Coordinator at

NIES

"The whole process was very smooth and items (report, hand-over meeting) were delivered on time. UX studio made sure to understand the background of the website and the industry, as well as our main concerns and needs, and reflect them in the UX review process. Their friendly approach and professionalism were impressive."

Fix usability issues hurting your growth

What you’ll get

Real examples from past reviews

FAQ

Want to learn more?